Japan votes to allow its troops in South Sudan to involve in combat operation under new mandate


Japanese cabinet gave a green light to a plan to beef up their soldier’s role in U.N. peacekeeping operations in South Sudan, a move that would let troops use weapons beyond purely self-defense scenarios for the first time since World War II.

The expanded role under the contentious new security laws, called kaketuke keigo, would allow SDF members engaged in the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) to come to the rescue of U.N. and nongovernmental organization workers under attack there.

The new mandate, which will apply to troops to be dispatched to South Sudan from Nov. 20, is in line with security legislation enacted last year to expand the overseas role of Japan’s Self-Defense Forces (SDF), as the military is known.

“South Sudan cannot assure its peace and stability on its own and for that very reason, a U.N. peacekeeping operation is being conducted,” Prime Minister Shinzo Abe told a parliamentary committee on Tuesday. “The SDF … is carrying out activities that only it can do in a tough environment.”

The Japanese troops are in South Sudan primarily to help build infrastructure in the war-torn country, but under the new mission will be allowed to respond to urgent calls from U.N. staff and non-governmental organization (NGO) personnel. Defence Minister Tomomi Inada has said the government does not envision Japanese troops rescuing other foreign troops.

The government also plans to assign the troops another new role made possible by the new legislation, to defend U.N. peacekeepers’ camps jointly with troops from other nations.

Opponents of the move fear the mission will ensnare Japanese troops in fighting for the first time since World War Two.

“Security is a concern. If it weren’t dangerous, why would they need to carry guns?” said Kiro Chikazawa, a Tokyo civil servant who took part in a small protest near Abe’s office.

Other critics say the deployment violates conditions for peacekeeping operations set in line with Japan’s pacifist constitution.

“It goes without saying that the operation must be executed within the confines of the constitution and pertinent Japanese laws,” said an October editorial by the Asahi newspaper.

“But now, South Sudan is effectively in a state of civil war,” the paper added. “Such being the case, we must opposed the assignment of rush-and rescue operations to the SDF.”

A civil conflict erupted in South Sudan in December 2013, but President Salva Kiir and his rival, former vice president Riek Machar signed, a peace deal in 2015 that was meant to halt the fighting. The agreement failed to stick. Machar has since left the country and sporadic clashes have continued.

Credit: Reuters, Japan Times