South Africa’s Treasury has recommended that President Jacob Zuma should pay back more than $500,000 of public funds spent upgrading his private residence with facilities including a chicken coop and a swimming pool.
The Treasury said in a statement on Monday that Zuma, the head of the ruling African National Congress (ANC) party, should pay back $509,000 for the unnecessary renovations.
In March, the country’s highest court found that the president had violated the constitution by defying an order to repay some of the money used in the $23m non-security upgrades for his home in Nkandla, in the rural eastern province of KwaZulu-Natal.
The work included a swimming pool, which was claimed to be a fire-fighting facility, a chicken run, a cattle enclosure, an amphitheatre and a visitors’ centre.
The lead petitioner, left wing Economic Freedom Fighters Party (EFF) official said the amount recommended by the treasury was not sufficient. Party spokesperson Mbuyisen Quintin Ndlozi told the media that Zuma’s admission to repay the money is an admission of corruption and incompetence as a head of state
“But most importantly, Zuma paying is an admission of guilt. The next step is criminal charges for benefiting, knowingly, from corruption.” Ndlozi said
Zuma has previously defended the upgrades, saying that the accusations against him were unfair given the importance of protecting any head of state.
The 74-year-old has been repeatedly urged to step down by several ANC veterans who fought in the anti-apartheid struggle that brought Nelson Mandela to power in 1994.
But he retains widespread loyalty in the party, and ANC politicians have regularly rallied to his defence.
In April, they easily defeated an opposition move to impeach the ANC leader who has been in power for seven years.
He has been haunted by months of scandals, including his sacking of two finance ministers in four days last year which rocked the markets and saw the rand currency plummet.
South Africa holds local elections in August and, if the ANC suffers a major drop in support, Zuma could lose backing within the party and not serve out the last three years of his final term.
Last week, a separate court threw out Zuma’s attempt to appeal against a ruling that he should face almost 800 corruption charges that were dropped in 2009 shortly before he came to power.
The charges relate to alleged corruption, racketeering, fraud and money laundering over a multibillion dollar arms deal.
Source: Agencies/East Africa Daily